Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

org - [FSCONS] Fscons project communication

org AT lists.fscons.org

Subject: Org mailing list

List archive

[FSCONS] Fscons project communication


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Grégoire <gregoire AT fripost.org>
  • To: org AT lists.fscons.org
  • Subject: [FSCONS] Fscons project communication
  • Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:45:36 +0100
  • List-archive: <https://lists.fscons.org/pipermail/org>
  • List-id: <org.lists.fscons.org>

Hello all,

At the evaluation meeting in December, we talked about communication during
fscons planning and decided to continue the discussion at a later point. I
suggest we take this discussion on the mailing list to get input from those
who cannot attend meetings in Göteborg.

Here are the problems I see and others that have been mentioned during the
meeting about the current communication situation (if I missed something,
feel free to add to this list):

- It's difficult to get an overview of what is going on
- By having most things discussed during meeting we miss the input of those
who cannot attend (occasionally or systematically)
- it's difficult to get involved if you don't live in Göteborg
- there is little traces: the minutes tend to report only the final decision
and less the discussion leading to this decision. In addition some things
decided during meetings are forgotten and never implemented

Electronic communication leaves more traces (if you're not convinced, ask the
NSA :-D) and can reach more people but I remember that I personally wanted to
have more meeting when the conference wast mostly organized on irc and I
still think they are good for newcomers, brainstorming and getting things
done faster together. They also provide some rhythm in the planning.

On the other hand, meetings are but one of possible collaboration tools. We
already have a wiki, this mailing list and an irc channel. A lot of open
source project seems to function ok by having only few physical meetings but
relying more on MLs, irc, wikis and documentations and bug tracking systems.

The general question is how can we make the conference planning more open and
more trackable?

Some specific points:
- What should we do during the meetings?
- What should we do electronically?
- Should we try to use an issue tracker to implement progress tracking?
- Maybe there would be more people if we had meetings in a pub? ;-)
- ...

A concrete idea I have been thinking about is to have some kind of internal
pre-conference: at some well chosen point in the planning we would have a
mini conference with the following features:

- in the same venue as the conference, so we get used to it, especially for
new-comers
- some talks about the conference organization: web infrastructure, budget,
promotion, graphics, important changes
- we could follow with some kind of hackathon where we work together on
different aspect of the conference and finish the day in a social place,
making it big enough and hopefully interesting enough for people to come from
outside of gbg

This will be a bit of work to organize and it would only be worth the trouble
if it attracts people who don't come to the regular meetings, but it might be
interesting to consider, and in my opinion it could advantageously replace a
few of our regular meetings.

Ok, I'm stopping here and I'll wait for someone else opinion on this.

Have a nice evening everybody,

Grégoire


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.

Top of Page