org AT lists.fscons.org
Subject: Org mailing list
List archive
- From: Grégoire <gregoire AT fripost.org>
- To: Oliver Propst <oliver.propst AT gmail.com>
- Cc: org AT lists.fscons.org
- Subject: Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:54:18 +0100
- List-archive: <https://lists.fscons.org/pipermail/org>
- List-id: <org.lists.fscons.org>
On mån, 2014-03-03 at 14:57 +0100, Oliver Propst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Grégoire
> <gregoire AT fripost.org>
> wrote:
> > On mån, 2014-03-03 at 13:13 +0100, Oliver Propst wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Grégoire
> >> <gregoire AT fripost.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I'm not sure I see it that way. It took a few years, and some amount of
> >> > work to have the current colors and "profile" applied relatively
> >> > consistently to a number of places from the video titles to the Twitter
> >> > feed, so I'm personally not super motivated to change it unless there
> >> > is a very good reason.
> >
> >> You are right that work is required from several persons and teams to
> >> make
> >> it right, but I think we will make it if we start working on it now.
> > The problem is not that I don't think we can make it but that I'd rather
> > do more important think with the time I spend for FSCONS, like having a
> > makerfaire :-D
>
> You always have to chose how you spend your time of course, and in a
> volunteer organization such FSCONS its completely up to you how you
> spend that time. With this said if we want to make changes that
> requires a certain amount of time, we need pepole who are willing to
> spend that time (as you are aware of).
I'm not sure I follow your point here.
> >> > I fail to see a huge benefit in the present case
> >> We differ here, I thinks its about time to change our profile and use
> >> >>lighter
> >> colors.
> > I see that we differ, but you still haven't expressed a concrete reason
> > why you think this change is necessary. For example, if we were
> > infringing on someone else's trademark, that'd be a good reason to act.
> > Why do you think that "it's about time" to change?
>
> An important reason as I have mentioned is time. As the time are
> passing by, our world, organization change. To reflect the changes
> (some) organizations choose to change their graphical profile, or does
> it without no obvious reasons. In our case, this it as I have
> mentioned this is something
> we discussed for some time.
I see, so basically you feel the current style/colors are outdated? I
don't thing so but maybe I'm outdated too :-D
> I also thinks this something that can be done now that we pretty have
> stable technical infrastructure that to my understanding do not
> require much work.
And the less thing we're changing, the more that's going to stay
true ;-)
/ǵ
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, (continued)
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/03/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Grégoire, 03/03/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Andreas Skyman, 03/03/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/03/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Andreas Nilsson, 03/04/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Jens Reuterberg, 03/04/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/04/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/20/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/03/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Oliver Propst, 03/04/2014
- Re: [FSCONS] A new (light) graphical profile for FSCONS, Grégoire, 03/03/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.