org AT lists.fscons.org
Subject: Org mailing list
List archive
- From: Grégoire <gregoire AT fripost.org>
- To: org AT lists.fscons.org
- Subject: Re: [FSCONS] Date set: 8-10 November, aspect communication
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:36:33 +0200
- List-archive: <https://lists.fscons.org/pipermail/org>
- List-id: <org.lists.fscons.org>
On 04/29/2013 07:53 PM, Thomas Gramstad wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Stian Rødven Eide wrote:
>> Also, a question that was not resolved is how the different aspects
>> should conduct their internal communication. Three suggestions were
>> mentioned:
>> * The person responsible for an aspect publishes their contact
>> information on the wiki and handles it themselves
>> * The general org-list will be used for all aspect-internal
>> communication as well.
>> * Every aspect gets their own mailing list.
>> Which would you all prefer?
>
> I suggest using the general org list for everything. If that list
> gets swamped, then we can split off the biggest sub aspects to
> separate mailing lists by demand, if/when they grow to critical mass.
Yes, I think this is better. Even last year, with the "commitees" in
place, the separate MLs where pretty much unused.
/ǵ
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [FSCONS] Date set: 8-10 November, aspect communication, Stian Rødven Eide, 04/23/2013
- Re: [FSCONS] Date set: 8-10 November, aspect communication, Bernhard Mollenhauer, 04/24/2013
- Re: [FSCONS] Date set: 8-10 November, aspect communication, Thomas Gramstad, 04/29/2013
- Re: [FSCONS] Date set: 8-10 November, aspect communication, Grégoire, 04/30/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.